|
|
 |
 |
 |
Urea Formaldehyde Notice
- Foreword
- Unlike foamed in place insulation, our Company guarantees the thermal
efficiency of our molded inserts for twenty years.
- State Bans
-
- California, Restriction of the use
of UFFI
- "Limitation on Sale. Urea formaldehyde foam is unsafe for use as insulation.
Sale within the State of California of urea formaldehyde foam insulation
is prohibited." Like several of the papers, should an exception be allowed,
application cannot be approved without a four-mil thick polyethylene barrier
between the insulation and living space.
- Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, and New York
- Prohibition against UFFI installations (bans).
- Ohio, Restriction on the transfer of
property.
- Specifically: Page 2, Paragraph D
- Federal Rulings
-
-
Consumer Product Safety Commission, "Lifting of Ban"
- Note: "The Commission still believes that the available evidence indicates
that there are risks associated with this product."
-
Consumer Product Safety Commission, "Ban on UFFI"
- CPSC Bans Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation.
-
Consumer Product Safety Commission, "Proposed Ban on UFFI"
- Discussion on the Proposed Nationwide Ban of Urea Formaldehyde Foam
and justification of the proposal.
-
Consumer Product Safety Commission, "CPSC Still Concerned"
- "The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission still considers urea formaldehyde
foam insulation (UFFI) to be a hazardous product, and that purchasers of
UFFI are at risk from elevated levels of formaldehyde."
- Environmental Protection Agency Letter
(May 1996)
- Specifically the third paragraph indicates EPA's view on UFFI, "However,
the initial imposition of the ban and the continuing concern for the potential
health effects of formaldehyde exposure effectively ended, in the early
1980's the practice of UFFI in homes."
-
Environmental Protection Agency, "Update on Formaldehyde: 1997"
- Section on "What are the Major Sources" describes Government belief
in product no longer being offered for sale and continued release of gas
over several years.
- Environmental
Protection Agency, "Formaldehyde", EPA website
- EPA website discusses sources in paragraph one and, in the remaining
document, the resulting effects.
- Research Data and Findings
-
- Concrete Block Insulating Systems,
Letter (September 2000)
- Subject: Chemical Testing of Core Fill 500 Foam
- Concrete Block Insulating Systems
(May 1999)
- "Evaluation of Foamed Cellular Plastics as a Method of Thermally Insulating
Exterior Walls" Contains photograph demonstrating shrinkage.
- Concrete Block Insulating Systems (July
1996)
- Technical Data Sheet #96-7, UFFI: Discusses shrinkage, disintegration,
toxicity, and performance. Contains Oak Ridge Laboratory evaluation.
- National Concrete Masonry Association, Letter
(April 1991)
- Industry response to Hi-R values promulgated by Foamers.
- National Concrete Masonry Association, Letter
(August 1990)
- Shows R values at reasonable densities but does not include reduced
values due to shrinkage, off gassing or grouting.
- Masonry Institute of Michigan
- Insulation Alert!, Volume II, Number 4, August 1980
- Private Sector Opinion
-
-
American Lung Association, "Formaldehyde" (February 2000)
- Section on "Reducing Exposure" suggests reducing exposure to formaldehyde
emitting materials whether or not adverse reactions are experienced.
-
Environmental Defense Fund Newsletter, "Making our Schools Safer"
- Item Number 5: "Require formaldehyde free carpeting, furniture and construction
materials."
-
korfil@cbisinc.com
|